Where one feels life distressed under a corporate socialist justice governance, it is wise to understand the…
Function Organic Theory…
There is a difference of lifting the veil to those of the mind of someone identified with and as viewed as the mind of the corporation, that should be amenable to the (by) laws established. The veil is lifted so a corporation’s legal right or liabilities may be disclosed that are attached to its members. The Function Organic Theory is invoked so that subjective legal rights or liabilities may be acknowledged, as ‘being’ attached to a corporation. The Natural Laws of tort are where an act or mental state becomes discovered as an essential element of a particular tort. ie., “Trover/Conversion, Trespass, Nuisance” as primarily rights for a Tort.
It is where the corporation can be capable of being held to have programmed that act or possessed that mental state in the person of one of its officers or employees. The corporation’s liability in tort is by the distinction from content of its contract, but not depending on the contents of its memorandum and articles. The corporation should not be able to escape the liability by disowning the acts or mental states of its de facto officers or employees on account of something contained in those contracted documents. The prosecutor may invoke their documents as to establish the status or power of a person within that corporation’s hierarchy.
Whether a ‘natural particular mind’ will be regarded as that of the corporation for the purpose of a particular action or prosecution will depend on many factors, including the size of the corporation, its internal organisation and distribution of powers and function. As well as the nature of the tort or crime alleged.
Where one seeks a ‘particular’ relief under the Crown presentation of Natural Justice, it is wise to understand the…
Centre of Gravity Theory
Where parties have not expressed any choice, it is left to the (Crown) courts to determine the “proper law” of the contract by an “objective” approach upon the transaction which has the closest and most reliable connection.
A ‘Centre of Gravity theory’ is of the attempt to give a semblance of one’s own ‘particular’ meaning to chaos, being extended out of the duress of living the commercialised quasi citizen Social Contract that governs paramount. The common law right to “Choose of Action” invites to enter one’s own equity of revocation, for the duress to be modified, by permitting past learned references to the ‘proper laws’ of Lex Loci Solutionis upon certain circumstances.
New presumptions of the unexpressed intentions of the parties can be discovered and acknowledged through the “Celtic Theatre Group” where new ‘rules’ are regarded by numerous clauses of ‘special performances’, to considered into potential dealings with specific types of “Lex contractus”.
First step is to invite and manage the regards of ‘participants’ with an ‘Estate in Tail’ as an “Inter alias actus” – (I have not been heard yet). To encourage new expressed and created characteristics through the Crown Hereditary Rights and Heraldic assessments of ‘Family Coat of Arms’, in the case of contracts dealing with the doctrine of perpetual “Immovables”, being within the presumption in favour of the law of the situation – “Lex Situ”; the Laws of the Land.
In contrast to the case of dealing with the merchant shipping citizen status as “Movables”, being as a presumption in favour of the Law of the Flag – (International law); the Laws of the Sea.
When one feels assured of being in balance with “Lex” – Full of Age and with Capacity demurrer, and with faith, trust and confidence to develop a “jus commune” joint remedy, it is wise to understand the…
Lorenzen (vested rights) Theory
If answers to conflict of laws cannot be deduced from pre-existing principles to ‘jurisdiction’, how are they then to be decided? It requires for adequate discussion ‘within an inquiry’ into the technique of ‘poetic’ human reasoning in general of that in the “field of law in particular”. A (Celtic Theatre Group) forum should apply its own laws unless there is a good reason why it should not, upon choice-of-laws upon the product of experience and a continuous desire for decisions based on ‘considerations’ of justice and utility, where the practical bearing is upon normal human activities and expectations.
A ‘Lex Fori’ should be applied as where the (Celtic Theatre Group) forum has an interest in the application of its ‘law to the situation’ – “Lex Situ”, as a function of a very high order by an ordinary process of construction and interpretation as to determine where the “Real” conflict between laws are involved, and to raise upon the question about the judiciary in conflict situations.
The difference to note is of that between the Crown “proper,” judicial function involved in the (Celtic Theatre Group) construction and interpretation of the “Law of the Forum”, to that of any
Corporate improper, political function involved in weighing upon the interest of the forum, ever so that the foreign state may be verbal, rather than a “Real” difference.
“The purpose of a “Lex Situ” (Celtic Theatre Group) forum is first to demolish any obsolete socialist corporate theories that makes the judge’s task harder, as he works his way out of any wreckage. Secondly, for the forum to assist the judge a better chance to arrive at the least erroneous answer, if the Celtic scholars have laboured in advance to break ground for a new “Remedial” path.
Summary & Commentary
The Function Organic Theory addresses how a corporation operates and how liabilities or legal rights attach to it by looking beneath abstract structures to the human agency within. Rather than treating a corporation as entirely separate from its actors, this approach lifts the corporate veil to examine whether an act or mental state essential to a tort, such as trespass, nuisance, or conversion, can be attributed to the corporation through its officers or employees. The Celtic Theatre Group recognises that individuals often find themselves constrained by obsolete corporate and socialist governance models. By engaging with this theory, participants can navigate and challenge these rigid structures, moving past corporate fictions to establish accountability and clear legal standing.
The Centre of Gravity Theory traditionally determines the proper law of a contract by identifying the transaction with the closest connection, but it is reframed as a method to bring meaning to chaos and alleviate the duress of living under a commercialised, quasi-citizen social contract. By exercising the common law right to a Choose of Action and invoking an equity of revocation, participants reclaim autonomy over their legal relationships. Through special performances and a structured framework, the Celtic Theatre Group serves as the active environment where new presumptions of unexpressed intentions are discovered. Participants holding an Estate in Tail are managed under the principle of Inter alias actus, declaring that they have not yet been heard. By incorporating Crown hereditary rights, heraldic assessments, and family coats of arms, individuals are guided in distinguishing between the perpetual immovables governed by the laws of the land and the movable status associated with maritime law.
The Lorenzen Vested Rights Theory approaches conflicts of law through practical human reasoning, experience, and a commitment to justice and utility rather than rigid, pre-existing jurisdictional rules. As a forum, the Celtic Theatre Group recognises that its own guiding principles and internal rules should be applied where it maintains a genuine interest in the situation, maintaining a sharp distinction between legitimate judicial interpretation and improper corporate political influence. The purpose as a Lex Situ forum is twofold. First, obsolete corporate theories that unnecessarily complicate the search for justice are actively dismantled. Second, Celtic scholars labour in advance to break ground on a new remedial path, ensuring that participants are guided toward clear, equitable, and correct legal outcomes.
